VATNZ - VATSIM New Zealand

VATNZ Discussion Board
It is currently Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:29 pm

All times are UTC + 12 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:37 pm
Posts: 2
Don't get it.


Attachments:
UNICOM-NZZO.jpg
UNICOM-NZZO.jpg [ 142.63 KiB | Viewed 162 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:39 pm 
Offline
VATNZ Board Member

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:01 pm
Posts: 702
I didn't even know you were a member of this forum. Does VATPAC's unicom-au channel cover the oceanic sectors in Australia?

_________________
Wesley St George
VATNZ6 - Pilot Operations Director
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:47 am
Posts: 78
Location: Timaru NZ
Quote:
Is there something you're trying to tell us here Greg? "I don't get it" isn't giving us much to work with . Unicom voice always has, and in all likelihood ,will always be an "optional extra".

Many don't use it simply for the fact that you are required to text information anyway over the unicom frequencies. Simply put. You don't have to bother :)


I thought it was pretty obvious. He's saying that we don't need to bother with two unicom voice channels for NZZC and NZZO flights.

_________________
TMA Controller(S3)
Senior ATP Captain - Noble Air (NBL5273G) http://nobleair.uuuq.com/
Image
"nil carburundum illegitimi"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:26 pm 
Offline
VATNZ Founder

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 2090
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Greg

This was set up when VATNZ fist commenced operations to get SB and FSInn aligned, because of how many FSInn users flew in from overseas without being in a correct voice room. At the time, simply making them consistent made sense.

And of course the reporting needs on each voice room is very different. NZZC should see a pilot making taxi and departure calls, as well as intentions then approach and landing calls, etc. Oceanic should see oceanic position reporting.

There are many times when it is necessary to have them split off and I wouldn't support a change to one for change sake.

Personally I'd like to see more of the pilots actually using them!!

_________________
Mark Richards
Ballarat, Australia
Regional Director - VATSIM Oceania
Founder - VATPAC & VATNZ
Chairman - RCRP - Oceania
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 46
Just as a small side note - how come text is mandatory for unicom? It would be nice if you could just use voice I guess, typing is almost impossible when flying manually and tuning radios and equipment at the same time. Unless you pause which isn't really allowed either right.

What would make more sense to me is if people with no mic's had to type - but surely people with no mic's still have speakers which I presume is all you need to listen to a unicom private channel.
Could be wrong. But yes, I realise this is probably a VATSIM wide thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 46
Actually I just found out a couple of reasons why:
David Klain wrote:
VATSIM is committed to serving the needs of all its members. VATSIM has a number of members who are text only for a variety of reasons (hardware, connectivity or hearing impairment). Those members are unable to hear voice transmissions. All VATSIM controllers automatically monitor text on their frequencies (the controller client software is built this way) and can provide text services when a pilot requires them. By its very nature, UNICOM is a frequency without a controller and there is no person "running" the frequency to ensure text-only pilots are aware of what is going on and getting the necessary information. As a result, VATSIM requires that all pilots transmitting on UNICOM transmit their information via text to ensure receipt by all concerned.

VATSIM is looking at a potential technical solution which would alert pilots when there is a text-only pilot on the UNICOM frequency and in range so they could use voice and only back it up with text when required. This is a significant programming change that would require changes to all of the pilot software clients (FSInn, Squawkbox, XSquawkbox, etc.) to support. If such a solution is possible is still under exploration.

http://forums.vatsim.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=38243

And
Quote:
As things are now, you can not use voice on unicom. ONLY TEXT. The explanation is technical.
But if you are up to it read along:
The vatsim-servers (The ones you connect to) are all connected in one great network. So a guy
on the European server can still se a guy from The US even though he connected to a different
server. They are all connected. So when you write something on Unicom it's broadcasted to all
aircrafts near you. Regardless of which server pilots are connected to.
The voice servers are NOT connected to each other! So people on an America voice server
can't hear people on a European voice server. So both guys can be parked in the same airport,
but if they not are on the same voice-server (Unicom) they can't hear each other. However they
still can text each other.

http://www.vaccsca.org/pdf/pilot/training/unicom.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:10 pm 
Offline
VATNZ Board Member

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:01 pm
Posts: 702
Mark Richards wrote:
Greg

This was set up when VATNZ fist commenced operations to get SB and FSInn aligned, because of how many FSInn users flew in from overseas without being in a correct voice room. At the time, simply making them consistent made sense.

And of course the reporting needs on each voice room is very different. NZZC should see a pilot making taxi and departure calls, as well as intentions then approach and landing calls, etc. Oceanic should see oceanic position reporting.

There are many times when it is necessary to have them split off and I wouldn't support a change to one for change sake.

Personally I'd like to see more of the pilots actually using them!!


Most pilots know the voice channels now too, it would take too much unnecessary effort to get people in one correct channel.

_________________
Wesley St George
VATNZ6 - Pilot Operations Director
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:47 am
Posts: 78
Location: Timaru NZ
Quote:
I thought it was pretty obvious. He's saying that we don't need to bother with two unicom voice channels for NZZC and NZZO flights.


On the contrary , not so obvious. I dont think thats what hes saying at all . It appeared he was asking why bother with unicom voice at all. The screenshot has 5 or 6 aircraft in ocenaic airspace and only 1 on the channel. Of course this would have been made a whole lot clearer with more than a 3 word post :)

Incidentally, I didnt reply to my own post :) Not sure whats up with that but it has my name beside it ....weird.

_________________
TMA Controller(S3)
Senior ATP Captain - Noble Air (NBL5273G) http://nobleair.uuuq.com/
Image
"nil carburundum illegitimi"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 279
Like everything these things take time, we at vANZ teach and encourage Pilots to use it. Probably just needs needs more advertising for noobs, maybe the SUPs could broadcast the channel details when there are pilots flying around with no ATC. Or something on the home page perhaps.

It does amaze me how many long timers here don't bother with it, and that goes with the West Island group... they switch over from unicom-au voice, to text in NZZC. Maybe this is because they think we are all on text.

_________________
Mark Helyar CEO
HR Manager / Events Director
Virtual Air New Zealand
http://www.virtualairnz.com
FE - Instructor / NZ PPL
Founder - vANZ
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:40 pm 
Offline
VATNZ Board Member

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:01 pm
Posts: 702
Mark Helyar wrote:
Like everything these things take time, we at vANZ teach and encourage Pilots to use it. Probably just needs needs more advertising for noobs, maybe the SUPs could broadcast the channel details when there are pilots flying around with no ATC. Or something on the home page perhaps.

It does amaze me how many long timers here don't bother with it, and that goes with the West Island group... they switch over from unicom-au voice, to text in NZZC. Maybe this is because they think we are all on text.


I always use the voice unicom as my secondary form of communication. I always transmit via text first and then voice if there are a lot of pilots in the voice unicom. I happen to use voice unicom more frequently in Australian Airspace than New Zealand. Honestly I couldn't say that I know where the reference for the voice unicom channel is on this website. Maybe we need some kind of introduction to flying in VATNZ Airspace tutorial, I would be more than happy to create it. Also with our airways clearances on domestic flights being so not like the rest of the worlds, maybe it would be a good thing to cover the basics in a simple tutorial for pilots.

_________________
Wesley St George
VATNZ6 - Pilot Operations Director
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:46 pm 
Offline
VATNZ Founder

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 2090
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Wesley St George wrote:
I always use the voice unicom as my secondary form of communication. I always transmit via text first and then voice if there are a lot of pilots in the voice unicom. I happen to use voice unicom more frequently in Australian Airspace than New Zealand. Honestly I couldn't say that I know where the reference for the voice unicom channel is on this website. Maybe we need some kind of introduction to flying in VATNZ Airspace tutorial, I would be more than happy to create it. Also with our airways clearances on domestic flights being so not like the rest of the worlds, maybe it would be a good thing to cover the basics in a simple tutorial for pilots.

Sounds like a great plan Wesley... I know a tutorial like that would go down well.

I also type first then use voice - means my voice is clear as I'm simply reading what I have just typed... VERY hard when I am flying a chopper mind you.

_________________
Mark Richards
Ballarat, Australia
Regional Director - VATSIM Oceania
Founder - VATPAC & VATNZ
Chairman - RCRP - Oceania
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:14 am 
Offline
VATNZ Board Member

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:54 pm
Posts: 1064
Location: Auckland
Wesley St George wrote:
Honestly I couldn't say that I know where the reference for the voice unicom channel is on this website.

http://vatnz.net/positions (scroll to the bottom of the table)

Wesley St George wrote:
Maybe we need some kind of introduction to flying in VATNZ Airspace tutorial, I would be more than happy to create it. Also with our airways clearances on domestic flights being so not like the rest of the worlds, maybe it would be a good thing to cover the basics in a simple tutorial for pilots.

Sounds like a good idea, Wesley. Doesn't have to be super long and detailed - we have the training areas of the site for that - but a brief guide to some of the wrinkles of flying in NZ aimed at foreign pilots would be very useful.

_________________
Nick Johnston, VATNZ1
Division Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whay bother with unicom_nzzo?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 279
Wesley St George wrote:
Maybe we need some kind of introduction to flying in VATNZ Airspace tutorial, I would be more than happy to create it. Also with our airways clearances on domestic flights being so not like the rest of the worlds, maybe it would be a good thing to cover the basics in a simple tutorial for pilots.


Excellent idea Wesley!, look forward to it.. and if you don't mind once you have completed it, I could create a link to it from Virtual Air New Zealand.

Cheers

_________________
Mark Helyar CEO
HR Manager / Events Director
Virtual Air New Zealand
http://www.virtualairnz.com
FE - Instructor / NZ PPL
Founder - vANZ
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 12 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group